The following Value Added Tax guidance note Produced by Tolley provides comprehensive and up to date tax information covering:
This guidance note provides an overview of what happens if HMRC suspects ‘conduct involving dishonesty’ has taken place whilst they are undertaking a indirect tax compliance visit. The following procedure covers all indirect taxes with the exception of Stamp Duties, Customs Duties and import VAT.
This procedure is designed to be used for cases involving a lower value where there is evidence of dishonest conduct or deliberate behaviour and HMRC do not consider that the COP9 procedure is the most suitable way of dealing with the matter. Please see the Managing serious defaulters guidance note for more information on the COP9 procedure that applies from 30 June 2014.
If HMRC identifies that the business has not accounted for indirect taxes correctly due to conduct involving dishonesty during a compliance check then they may levy a civil evasion penalty under VATA 1994, s 60 on the business. If HMRC also establishes that the business has not accounted for indirect taxes correctly due to deliberate behaviour then they can also apply a deliberate or a deliberate and concealed penalty as well.
If HMRC has reason to believe that the taxpayer has behaved in a dishonest manner then they will invite the taxpayer and their professional adviser (if they have one) to attend a meeting to discuss HMRC’s concerns. The taxpayer will be asked to confirm whether they have any special needs or require an interpreter at the meeting so they can ensure that they prepare for the meeting taking all of these things into account.
HMRC will advise the taxpayer and their professional adviser:
the compliance check is not being conducted with a view to commencing a criminal prosecution in relation to any matters that are the subject of the check
HMRC will be checking the behaviour and the periods that are the subject of the check rather than specific information which has caused their concern that the taxpayer is behaving dishonestly
**Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free for 7 days with a trial of TolleyGuidance.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Almost all companies will have some loan relationships. However, some items that are commonly assumed to be loan relationships are not (eg outstanding consideration for the sale / purchase of property and inter-company balances relating to unpaid amounts for goods or services, in each case where
The transactions in securities (TiS) legislation is anti-avoidance legislation aimed at situations where close company shareholders have engineered a disposal of shares to obtain a beneficial capital gains tax (CGT) rate, ie avoid income tax, on specified transactions.The targeted anti-avoidance
Class 2 and Class 4 NIC are payable by self-employed earners and partners in a partnership. This guidance note considers Class 2 contributions. For Class 4 contributions, see the Class 4 national insurance contributions guidance note.Class 2 NIC arise where a self-employed individual has income
Class 1 and Class 1AClass 1 and Class 1A are the categories of NIC that can be charged on expenses reimbursed and benefits provided to employees. These classes are mutually exclusive. A benefit cannot be subject to both Class 1 and Class 1A NIC. Three requirements must be met before Class 1A NIC is