The following Employment Tax guidance note Produced by Tolley in association with Caroline Harwood of Burges Salmon LLP provides comprehensive and up to date tax information covering:
Companies engage in more complex planning for their share incentive arrangements for a number of reasons. These include funding issues for participants where:
the initial value of an award is relatively high
companies are having to deal with headroom issues (ie they may have reached their limits on shareholder dilution)
companies wish to take advantage of potentially beneficial tax treatment for their employees where such companies do not qualify for the tax advantaged plans which satisfy the requirements of ITEPA 2003, Schs 2–5 (the qualifying plans), including Enterprise Management Incentives (EMI) and the company share option plan (CSOP)
As such, more complex plans aim to provide a share-based award for employees with a low initial value but with the potential to generate growth in the shares that is subject to capital gains tax rather than income tax.
This note looks at two different structures often used to achieve this aim by summarising the commercial considerations, an outline of the structure and briefly discusses the tax treatment of each:
jointly owned share plans (also known as JSOP or split interest plans)
flowering shares (also known as growth share plans)
It should be emphasised that professional advice should be taken before embarking on the implementation of either of these arrangements, as this note is a summary and not a comprehensive guide.
The objective of both of these arrangements is to reward the participating employee with an increase in the value of shares in his employing company or group, often linked to corporate performance conditions, in a tax efficient manner. The theory is that by achieving a beneficial tax treatment, the plan puts in place an effective incentive as the individual will be able to retain more of the gain they have worked to help generate. The reward is hence more meaningful to the employee and potentially more cost effective for the employer.
As a result, the JSOP route is most commercially useful
**Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free for 7 days with a trial of TolleyGuidance.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
IntroductionThe CFC rules as outlined in this note apply to accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013, the date upon which significant changes made by Finance Act 2012 became effective.From this date, the CFC rules also apply to foreign branches in respect of which an exemption
Introduction to the regimeThe aim of the patent box regime is to provide an incentive for companies to develop and retain patents and other qualifying intellectual property within the UK as part of the Government’s growth agenda. Finance Act 2012 originally introduced the legislation governing the
Investors’ relief is a capital gains tax (CGT) relief on the disposal of qualifying shares in an unlisted company. A taxpayer making a disposal that qualifies for investors’ relief will pay tax at a rate of 10%.Although it is a separate relief, the rules for investors’ relief were intended as an
The substantial shareholding exemption (SSE) provides a complete exemption from the liability to corporation tax on the gains generated from qualifying disposals of shares and interests in shares by qualifying companies. Conversely, if losses are generated by the disposal and the SSE conditions are