The following Owner-Managed Businesses guidance note Produced by Tolley provides comprehensive and up to date tax information covering:
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is widely used in the commercial world as a cheaper, more time efficient and effective way of dealing with issues and disagreements than formal litigation. ADR can come in a number of different formats including mediation, arbitrations and third party negotiation.
In tax disputes with HMRC, ADR takes the form of mediation, where an independent mediator acts as a facilitator in order to try to resolve the dispute without binding the parties in advance of any outcome. The mediator will give directions for how the parties are to engage in the process. If ADR fails, the parties can still decide to adopt the litigation route. See the Appealing an HMRC decision ― outline guidance note.
For more information on the interaction between ADR and the HMRC litigation and settlement strategy, and the other issues to consider in relation to ADR, see the HMRC policy on alternative dispute resolution guidance note.
This guidance note considers the ADR process in more detail.
ADR can be an alternative to taking cases to litigation. The following characteristics are outlined by HMRC as indicative of situations that it considers may be suitable for ADR process:
there is a disagreement on key points between HMRC and the taxpayer
working relationships between the parties have broken down
both parties are entrenched in their own position and without the intervention of a third party are not prepared to consider alternatives
there is a disagreement on the underlying facts of the case or on the relevance of certain facts. For example:
the taxpayer wants to understand why HMRC has not agreed with the evidence they provided and it wants to use other evidence instead
the taxpayer is not clear regarding what information has been used and they consider that HMRC has made incorrect assumptions
HMRC needs to explain why it needs further information from the taxpayer
further suitable evidence needs to be obtained to assist
**Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free for 7 days with a trial of TolleyGuidance.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Legislative definition of plant and machineryThe general rule allowing capital allowances on plant and machinery is given at CAA 2001, s 11. There is no statutory definition of the term ‘plant and machinery’ but there is confirmation in the legislation on what constitutes a building or a structure
This note provides details on how to calculate quarterly instalment payments (QIPs) for large and very large companies.The instalment amounts are based on the estimated corporation tax liability of the company’s current accounting period. Therefore, this means that large and very large companies
This guidance note explains how trustees of bare trusts are treated for income tax and capital gains purposes. Although a bare trust is, in equity, a type of trust, for both income tax and capital gains tax purposes its existence is transparent. This means that no tax liability falls on the trustees
Class 1 and Class 1AClass 1 and Class 1A are the categories of NIC that can be charged on expenses reimbursed and benefits provided to employees. These classes are mutually exclusive. A benefit cannot be subject to both Class 1 and Class 1A NIC. Three requirements must be met before Class 1A NIC is