Trading losses of companies are computed in the same way as trading profits. Relief for the loss can be obtained by set-off against other profits. This can be by way of a claim to set the loss against total profits of the same accounting period or, if the loss exceeds those profits, against total profits of the previous twelve months. Alternatively, the loss, or the remaining loss, can be carried forward to future accounting periods for set off against future profits. If the company is a member of a group, a loss can be surrendered to another company in the group for set off against their profits, either in the same period or in a subsequent period.
When does a trading loss arise?
Trading losses of companies are computed in the same way as trading profits. They must be calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice (GAAP), subject to any adjustments required or authorised by law. The starting point for calculating trading profits or losses is therefore usually the profit or loss before tax figure as per the accounts, which is then subject to tax adjustments where applicable. Where the adjusted trading result figure is a loss, the trade profit amount in the corporation tax computation will be nil.
How is relief for a trading loss given in the same accounting period?
Trading losses can be offset against total profits of the same period. Total profits include, for example, chargeable gains or property business profits. No partial claims are allowed and the claim must either use all of the loss, or eliminate all of the available profits. The company must carry on the trade on a commercial basis and with a view to making a profit. The claim must be made within two years from the end of the accounting period in which the loss was incurred.
How is relief for a trading loss given in an earlier accounting period?
Trading losses may be carried back for relief against total profits of the previous 12 months. This claim may only be made once a current year claim has been made and an excess of losses remains or where there were no current year profits.
How is relief for a trading loss given in subsequent accounting periods?
If a loss has not been relieved in another way, a company can generally carry it (or the balance remaining after other claims) forward to the next accounting period for relief against total profits. The company must continue to carry on the trade in which the loss arose in the period in which it is used and there are further conditions to be met. A claim must be made within two years of the end of the period in which the loss is used. The claim can be for all the available amount or only part of it. Different rules apply to losses which arose before 1 April 2017.
Are there restrictions on the use of carried-forward losses?
Relief for carried-forward losses may be restricted. An annual £5 million deductions allowance must be shared between income and capital losses in proportions chosen by the company. The effect of the loss restriction is to restrict the amount of profits that can be relieved with carried-forward losses to 50% where they exceed the deductions allowance. The rules involve complex calculations and apply with effect from 1 April 2017.
What additional reliefs are available when the company stops trading?
Trading losses incurred by a company in the final 12 months leading up to the discontinuance of trade may be carried back for up to three years from the period beginning immediately before that 12-month period. This is often referred to a ‘terminal loss relief’. It is likely that this will involve an apportionment of losses incurred in the penultimate accounting period because cessation accounts are not always exactly 12 months long. Where the carry-back claim is made against profits of more than one accounting period, losses must be offset against later years first. Claims must be made within two years of the end of the period in which the loss was incurred.
Terminal loss relief is augmented by an additional relief for carried-forward losses incurred on or after 1 April 2017. Such losses can be carried back for up to three years from the end of the terminal accounting period. Claims must be made within two years after the terminal period.
What reliefs are available to companies which are members of a group?
As an alternative to the above reliefs, companies which are members of a75% group can surrender trade losses as group relief for set off against the profits of other group members. The company is not required to set off trading losses against its own profits before surrendering them as group relief. For losses arising on or after 1 April 2017, a company may also surrender trading losses brought forward under the group relief for carried-forward losses rules.
Where a trade is transferred between companies under common 75% ownership, trading losses of the trade can also be transferred into the successor company. This is subject to restriction if the liabilities of the predecessor company which are not transferred exceed the value of the assets not transferred plus the transfer consideration.
Are there anti-avoidance rules?
There are several anti-avoidance rules which apply to restrict or deny the set-off of trading losses. They include restrictions where there is both a change in ownership of a company and a major change in the nature or conduct of its trade within a five-year period. A trading loss incurred in an accounting period beginning before the change in ownership may not be relieved against profits of an accounting period ending after the change of ownership. Similarly, a loss incurred in an accounting period ending after the change of ownership may not be relieved against profits of an accounting period beginning before the change in ownership.
There is also a ‘targeted anti-avoidance rule’ (TAAR) for corporate losses which applies where there is an arrangement with a main purpose to obtain a loss-related tax advantage and it is reasonable to regard the arrangements as circumventing the intended limits of relief under the relevant loss provisions or they otherwise exploit shortcomings in these provision.
View the related Tax Guidance about Corporate trading losses
Property investment or trading?
Property investment or trading?OutlineThe distinction between dealing or development and investing in property is crucial to many areas of tax law. Often it will be quite clear cut as to whether a person is trading or investing in land. A person buying property to let out long term will be making a property investment, whereas someone buying a property to refurbish and sell will most likely be trading as a property dealer or property developer. However, where does one draw the line between activity regarded as dealing and activity looked upon as investment?First, it is important to realise that the tests for whether one is dealing in property or making a property investment are the same as for any other trade. Therefore, a good place to start is to look at the ‘badges of trade’.The badges of trade are not a statutory concept, but are a recognised set of criteria developed by the courts to identify when a person is undertaking a trading activity. They can be applied to property transactions just as they can to a variety of other activities.It is not necessary for a transaction to have all of the badges in order to be regarded as dealing or developing and clearly some badges will carry greater weight than others, depending on the facts of the case. Indeed, in some cases the existence of one single badge can be enough for the person to be trading. The situation will therefore always need to be considered carefully in
Transactions in UK land
Transactions in UK landThe rules on taxing the profits of dealing in and developing UK land introduced by FA 2016 are mainly designed to ensure UK non-residents as well as UK residents are within the scope of UK tax on these profits. These rules replace the previous legislation on transactions in land. The rules are widely drafted and catch all persons undertaking transactions in UK land and property, whether resident in the UK or resident outside the UK. When originally enacted, the rules applied to profits arising from contracts entered into from 5 July 2016. However, the commencement provisions were amended by F(No 2)A 2017, s 39 such that all profits recognised in the accounts on or after 8 March 2017 are taxed, regardless of the date of the contract.This guidance note firstly discusses the current rules as they apply for corporation tax purposes and, secondly, the previous rules which applied prior to 8 March 2017.Separate rules apply for income tax which are not discussed further in this guidance note, although the key provisions are similar. For personal tax rules, see the Transactions in UK land ― individuals guidance note. Given the wide drafting of the current provisions, at first it was not clear how investment activities would be targeted. However, HMRC has provided some guidance on this and has confirmed that it is not the purpose of the rules to alter the treatment of the activity if it is clearly investment. Transactions such as buying
Research and development SME tax reliefs
Research and development SME tax reliefsEnhanced R&D deduction for SMEsA company incurring qualifying R&D expenditure can claim a deduction equal to 230% of the relevant costs incurred in calculating its taxable total profits. The deduction is given by allowing a further 130% of the qualifying R&D expenditure, in addition to the usual 100% deduction for such qualifying expenditure, in arriving at the adjusted profits for tax purposes.HMRC has produced a guide to R&D tax relief for small companies which can be found at Making R&D easier for small companies.The definition of an SME is detailed in the Research and development (R&D) expenditure ― overview guidance note and qualifying expenditure is set out in the Qualifying expenditure for R&D tax relief guidance note.The Research and development expenditure for SMEs (A) video sets out the key qualifying criteria for the regime, together with some illustrative examples.Note that where the company also qualifies to claim one of the creative sector reliefs (such as television tax relief and video games relief) it must choose between SME R&D relief and the creative sector reliefs, it cannot claim both in respect of the same project because they are both State Aid. An SME can claim large company R&D expenditure credit (RDEC) on the same project for which a creative sector relief claim has been made but the expenditure on that project can either be relieved under the creative sector relief or RDEC it cannot be relieved under both schemes, see below
Corporate interest restriction ― overview
Corporate interest restriction ― overviewThe corporate interest restriction (CIR) essentially limits the amount of interest expense a company can deduct from its taxable profits if the interest expense is over £2 million. The actual mechanics of the CIR calculation are highly complex (the legislation is over 150 pages long) and are detailed below. Before looking at the detail of the rules, it is important to note that there are a few points that are specific to the CIR regime, as follows:•the rules operate in relation to the worldwide group and by reference to the period of account (PoA) of the group for which the consolidated financial statements are prepared. A worldwide group usually refers to an ultimate parent and each of its consolidated subsidiaries, although it is possible to have a single-company worldwide group•the CIR works on a group rather than a company-by-company basis which is different to most taxing provisions. What this means is that most calculations required by the rules are carried out at the group level with any interest restrictions etc being made afterwards to individual companiesThe CIR applies to ‘tax interest expense’. This is the legislative phrase used to encompass a wide range of interest and interest-like transactions such as:•most loan relationship debits•some derivative contract debits•the finance cost element of certain arrangements or transactions involving finance leasing, debt factoring or service concession arrangementsTIOPA 2010, s 382For simplicity, when the word interest is used in this guidance note, it includes these
Corporate interest restriction ― carry-forward amounts
Corporate interest restriction ― carry-forward amountsWhat can be carried forward under the CIR rules?Companies may experience variations in business profits and market interest rates. Changes in capital structure that impact the level of debt on the balance sheet may also occur from time to time. These and other sources of volatility could result in interest disallowances in some periods and unused interest allowances in other periods.To provide a greater element of fairness in the corporate interest restriction (CIR) rules, there are a number of carry-forward provisions:Tax attributeOwnershipCarry-forward periodStatutory referenceTax-interest disallowedCompanyIndefinite carry forwardTIOPA 2010, s 378Unused interest allowanceWorldwide groupFive yearsTIOPA 2010, ss 392–395AExcess debt capWorldwide groupNext period of account (PoA)TIOPA 2010, ss 400(3)–(7), 400AAs detailed in the table above, the tax attributes can belong to either the group as a whole or to an individual company. This distinction in ownership of these attributes is important.Where the tax attribute belongs to the worldwide group, then any change to the ultimate parent will result in the loss of those tax attributes at that point, other than where, for reorganisations, a new holding company is inserted between an existing ultimate parent company and its shareholders. (Where the group retains the same ultimate parent following a transaction, other changes to the composition of the group are ignored, ie the worldwide group is treated as the same group.) This applies in the case of all attributes except tax-interest disallowance, which belongs to the individual
Companies in partnership
Companies in partnershipInsertion of corporate partners, usually as members of a limited liability partnership (LLP), has become increasingly popular in recent years. This type of planning was particularly attractive given the introduction of the top rate of income tax with effect from April 2010 and the gradual reduction in corporation tax rates. Provided that cash is not required by the individual members, profit share can be allocated to the corporate partner and set aside until such time that it can be extracted, hopefully at lower rates in the future. For further information (predominantly on the pre-FA 2014 rules), see the Introducing corporate partners guidance note.The scope for tax planning using mixed partnership structures is substantially decreased following the changes made by Finance Act 2014. The changes all affect mixed partnerships that are partnerships or LLPs of which the partners include a mixture of corporate and individual partners or members. The changes aim to counter tax motivated allocations of profits and losses to non-individual partners and to treat remuneration received by individual members of LLPs which is disguised salary as if received in the capacity of employees rather than partners.This guidance note gives an overview of the basic rules relating to the preparation of tax computations and returns
Group companies
Group companiesThis guidance note is intended to cover the main strategies that a group of companies should consider in advance of the year end. The strategies outlined are aimed at reducing the group’s overall liability to corporation tax and other costs by:•ensuring that losses within a group are relieved as quickly as possible •reducing the compliance burden on the group overall, resulting in both time and cost savingsThis note should be read in conjunction with the following notes:•Introduction to year-end tax planning•Chargeable gains planning•Year end tax planning ― international issuesSee also Checklist ― year-end tax planning for businesses for more information.For the definition of a group company, see the definition of group for group relief purposes in the Group relief guidance note.MergersSubject to commercial and legal considerations, large groups of companies should consider whether a reduction in the number of distinct corporate entities would reduce professional, legal and other costs without interfering with operational efficiency.Merging corporate entities to form a single company or a smaller group of companies may reduce overall group overheads.The most common way that a merger is achieved is by transferring the trade of one company to another company, leaving the first company dormant. The dormant company is then struck off the register.For more information on the transfers of the trade and assets between 75% group members, see the Transfer of a trade guidance note.See also the Reconstructions involving transfer of business guidance note.For the VAT considerations of transferring a trade
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.