Judicial review in tax cases

By Tolley and written by Anne Redston
Corporation_tax_img2

The following Corporation Tax guidance note by Tolley and written by Anne Redston provides comprehensive and up to date tax information covering:

  • Judicial review in tax cases
  • What is JR?
  • HMRC decisions and JR
  • Legislative provisions potentially subject to JR
  • Where to make your application for JR
  • JR in the High Court (Admin Chamber)
  • JR in the UT
  • Interactions with the FTT

This guidance note considers judicial review (JR) in the context of tax.

In particular, it explains:

  • what JR is
  • the scope of JR
  • where to make an application for JR, and in particular:
    • when it is possible to make an application to the Upper Tribunal (UT)
    • whether it is possible to make an application to the First-tier Tribunal (FTT)
  • what to do if the dispute involves both public law and technical tax issues
  • the remedies available ― ie what outcomes to expect if you win

JR is complex and this guidance note is only a summary. Unless you are experienced in JR work, it is recommended that you take specialist advice.

In particular, this guidance note does not cover non-tax related claims, criminal matters, or Scots or Northern Irish law.

What is JR?

JR is the procedure whereby the court considers whether the decision of a public body was lawful.

SCA 1981, s 31 (subscription sensitive); CPR 54.1 ; ARTG12010

JR has classically been described as ‘not an appeal from a decision, but a review of the manner in which the decision was made’.

Chief Constable of the North Wales Police v Evans [1982] 3 All ER 141 at 155 (subscription sensitive)

JR proceedings can be taken against:

  • any public body, including HMRC, and (R v CIR (ex p Preston) [1985] STC 282; IRC v National Federation of Self-Employed and Small Businesses [1981] STC 260 at 265–266 (both subscription sensitive))
  • legislation, including secondary legislation (CPR 54.1 )

JR is normally only available when there is no alternative remedy (such

More on Appeals: