Witness statement opposing an application for an order declaring that the service of the claim form without the permission of the court was ineffective
Produced in partnership with Nicholas Pointon of St John's Chambers
Witness statement opposing an application for an order declaring that the service of the claim form without the permission of the court was ineffective

The following Dispute Resolution precedent produced in partnership with Nicholas Pointon of St John's Chambers provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:

  • Witness statement opposing an application for an order declaring that the service of the claim form without the permission of the court was ineffective

Witness statement opposing an application for an order declaring that the service of the claim form without the permission of the court was ineffective

Practical considerations arising from the UK leaving the EU are set out in the general drafting notes to this Precedent.

Filed on behalf of the Respondent

Witness statement of [insert initial and surname of witness]

Number of witness statement: [insert number of witness statement in relation to the witness]

Exhibit details: [insert initials and number of each exhibit referred to]

Date on which the statement was made: [insert date]

Claim No. [insert claim number].

[IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

[BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS [OF ENGLAND AND WALES OR IN [insert location] OR

[Specify division]

[Specify specialist court]

[Insert location] DISTRICT REGISTRY

THE COUNTY COURT AT [insert location]

[BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS LIST

Between:

  1. [Insert party]        Claimant/Respondent

  1. and

  1. [Insert party]        Defendant/Applicant

__________________________________________________________________

[Number of witness statement eg first] WITNESS STATEMENT OF [Insert name of witness] ON BEHALF OF THE CLAIMANT

__________________________________________________________________

This Precedent and associated drafting notes provide a witness statement opposing an application for an order declaring that the service of the claim form without the permission of the court was ineffective. This Precedent applies where the claimant has served the claim form without permission on the basis that the court has jurisdiction under Regulation (EU) 1215/2012, Brussels I (recast) and the defendant challenges effective service of the claim form. Practical considerations arise as a consequence of the

Popular documents