The following IP precedent provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Intellectual property rights indemnity
The Supplier shall defend the Customer against any third party claim that the Customer’s use or possession of any of the [Deliverables OR Works] as authorised under this Agreement infringes [the Intellectual Property Rights of a third party OR a third party copyright or issued patent][ under the laws of [insert countries] ](IPR Claim), and indemnify and hold the Customer harmless from and against any damages finally awarded by a court of competent jurisdiction or required to be paid under the terms of a settlement as a direct result of the IPR Claim, provided that:
the Customer promptly notifies the Supplier in writing on becoming aware of any reasonably likely or actual IPR Claim (such notice to include full details as to the nature and basis of the IPR Claim);
the Customer makes no admission of liability, communication or payment to the third party making the IPR Claim or agrees any settlement or compromise of the relevant IPR Claim without the prior written consent of the Supplier;
the Supplier is granted[ at its request] the sole control and conduct of the defence of the IPR
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Tipping off and prejudicing an investigationIt would undermine the benefit to the authorities if, a suspicious activity report (SAR) having been made, the alleged offender were to be made aware of the interest in their activities so that they could take steps to cover up their misdeeds or disappear.
What is recklessness?In respect of some statutory offences and common law crimes the prosecution are required to prove a mental element of recklessness on the part of the defendant.Recklessness means unjustified risk taking on the part of the accused.Prior to the House of Lords decision in Re G
Company directors are not, by virtue only of their office as director, automatically entitled under company law to remuneration for services as a director or to reimbursement of expenses incurred in rendering such services. Power to pay directors remuneration for their services will need to be
This Practice Note considers the doctrine of forum non conveniens, also referred to as the appropriate forum or the proper place for a dispute to be determined. This doctrine is of relevance when determining whether the courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction to hear a dispute and is applied
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.