The following IP precedent produced in partnership with Andrew Bowler of Bristows, Sean Ibbetson of Bristows and Lucie Fortune of Bristows provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Case No. [insert claim number]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS OF ENGLAND & WALES
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LIST (ChD)
[INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND ENTERPRISE COURT (IPEC)
[insert full name of claimant] Claimant
[insert full name of defendant] Defendant
REPLY AND DEFENCE TO COUNTERCLAIM
Save insofar as the Defence and Counterclaim of the Defendant (the Defence) comprises admissions of matters alleged in the Particulars of Claim, or as otherwise addressed below, the Claimant joins issue with the Defendant in respect of the content of their Defence and relies on CPR rule 16.7(2).
Paragraph 3 is noted. In particular:
It is denied that Paragraph 3(1) is a full and accurate description of the Claimant’s business. [provide further details, if appropriate].
[It is averred that the Claimant has supplied [insert description of goods and/or services which the defendant does not admit have been supplied by the claimant but which the claimant has in fact supplied. Provide further details, if appropriate].
It is denied that the sign used by the Claimant is [insert sign which the defendant alleges the claimant to have used. Include screenshots or annexes of the defendant’s use, if appropriate].]
Paragraph 5 is denied. For the reasons set out below, the Registered Trade Mark is valid and should not be revoked.
[Paragraphs 9 and 10 are
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
Complete all the fields above to proceed to the next step.
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
Liquidated damages in construction contractsThis Practice Note explains what liquidated and ascertained damages (LADs/LDs) are and their purpose in a building contract. It considers the difference between liquidated damages and general (or unliquidated) damages and looks at the enforceability of
The Financial Assistance Scheme—what are the available benefits?THIS PRACTICE NOTE APPLIES TO SCHEMES ENTERING THE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE SCHEME FROM 1 JANUARY 2012.Where a scheme, its employer(s) and individual members have satisfied the criteria for eligibility into the Financial Assistance Scheme
Escrow accounts and escrow agreementsThis Practice Note examines why parties involved in a construction project may enter into an escrow agreement (or escrow deed) to set up an escrow account. It looks at the benefits of paying funds into escrow, how an escrow account operates and the provisions
Negligence—key elements to establish a negligence claimNegligence—what are the key ingredients to establish a claim in negligence?For liability in negligence to be founded, four key ingredients must be present:•duty of care•breach of that duty•damage (which is caused by the breach)•foreseeability of
0330 161 1234