The following Practice Compliance precedent provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
[Insert executive summary of report findings]
[[Insert summary of recommendations, eg:]
Scope of audit
[A copy of the audit plan is attached in Appendix 1.]
[Set out scope of audit, eg This audit has been carried out to examine and evaluate the adequacy and effectiveness of the policies, controls and procedures adopted by [name of firm] to comply with the requirements of the Money Laundering Regulations 2017 and to make recommendations in relation to those policies.]
As part of the audit:
the policies, procedures and other documents listed in Appendix 2 were reviewed;
interviews were conducted with the partners and staff listed in Appendix 3;
the matter files listed in Appendix 4 were reviewed for their compliance with the firm’s policies and procedures;
Specific incidences of non-compliance
[The audit identified the following specific incidences of non-compliance:
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
The Public Private Partnership (PPP) models are a popular way for governments to involve private investment, expertise and risk in procuring infrastructure, with the potential to deliver a project more efficiently and economically. One of the most popular PPP models for procuring infrastructure
Millett LJ subdivided types of constructive trust into two categories, distinguishing between:•the constructive trust proper, where equity intervenes to prevent the legal owner from unconscionably denying the beneficial interest of another (known as the institutional constructive trust)•the
This Precedent letter covers disclosure obligations under CPR 31. It does not apply to proceedings subject to the disclosure pilot scheme under CPR PD 51U. For guidance on the disclosure pilot scheme, see Practice Note: Business and Property Courts—the disclosure pilot scheme. For a client letter on
Case number [insert number][In the principal registryORIn the [insert court location] FAMILY court]Sitting at [insert place]Notice of actingBetween[insert petitioner name]Petitionerand[insert respondent name]RespondentTake notice that we [insert name of firm] have been appointed to act as the
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.