The following IP precedent produced in partnership with Simon Portman of Marks & Clerk provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Agreement is made on [insert date]
[insert licensor name] [of OR a [company OR partnership OR limited liability partnership OR [incorporated OR constituted OR in [insert jurisdiction, eg England and Wales] whose registered number is [insert company or LLP number] and whose [registered office OR principal place of business OR is at OR [insert address] (Licensor); and
[insert licensee name] of OR a company OR partnership OR limited liability partnership] incorporated OR constituted] in [insert jurisdiction, eg England and Wales] whose registered number is [insert company or LLP number] and whose registered office OR principal place of business] is at] [insert address] (Licensee)
(each of the Licensor and the Licensee being a party and together the Licensor and the Licensee are the parties).
The Licensor owns the Technology IP.
The Licensee has agreed to evaluate the Technology IP so that it can decide whether to take a licence of it according to the terms below.
The parties agree:
Definitions and interpretation
In this Agreement:
means any entity that directly or indirectly Controls, is Controlled by, or is under common Control with, another entity;
means [the date of this Agreement OR [insert fixed date]];
[has the meaning given to it in section 1124 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 OR means the
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
Complete all the fields above to proceed to the next step.
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Fraud by false representationFraud by false representationFraud by false representation applies to a broader range of conduct than the offences under the preceding legislation (the Theft Act 1968 (TA 1968)). No gain or loss need actually be made, and no deception need operate on the mind of the
ECHR, art 5(4)—rights and dutiesThe scope of article 5(4) Article 5(4) of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) provides that: 'Everyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings by which the lawfulness of his detention shall be decided
Perverting the course of justiceElements of the offence of perverting the course of justicePerverting the course of justice is a common law offence which can only be tried on indictment in the Crown Court. The elements of the offence are:•a person acts or embarks on a course of conduct•which has a
Stay of proceedings—when can you apply to stay a claim?This Practice Note considers the question of when court proceedings can be stayed. It identifies scenarios in which a party may apply for a stay of proceedings, including to allow for: a jurisdictional challenge; arbitration; an attempt to
0330 161 1234