The following Employment precedent provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Paragraph 1 of the Grounds of Claim is admitted.
As to paragraph 2 of the Grounds of Claim, it is denied that the Claimant’s colleagues were improperly altering test data and it is denied that the test data as amended gave a misleading impression of the testing the compound had undergone. The Claimant’s colleagues made standard adjustments to test data in accordance with industry guidelines. It is not admitted, if it is alleged, that the Claimant believed that the adjustments were improper or misleading and, if the Claimant did have such a belief, it is denied that it was reasonable. A chemist of the Claimant’s training and experience would have been well aware of the industry guidelines and therefore that the adjustments were standard and appropriate.
It is admitted that on [insert date], the Claimant told [insert name] that [insert names] had been inappropriately altering test data. It is admitted that [insert name] expressed concern and said that he would investigate the allegation.
[Insert name] made enquiries and in particular examined the test data and the working documents relating to the test data. He discovered that no inappropriate adjustments had been made to the test data.
It is denied that the Claimant heard nothing further about the matter; [insert name] met with the Claimant on [insert date]
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
Complete all the fields above to proceed to the next step.
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
Direct effect of EU lawWhat is direct effect of EU law?The doctrine of direct effect is a fundamental principle of EU law developed by the Court of Justice of the European Union in Van Gend en Loos. It is a mechanism through which individuals can enforce rights in Member States’ courts, based on EU
European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA)BREXIT: 11pm (GMT) on 31 December 2020 (‘IP completion day’) marked the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period entered into following the UK’s withdrawal from the EU. Following IP completion day, key transitional arrangements
RobberyRobberyRobbery is a theft offence, involving dishonesty but elevated also by the intention to use force.Robbery can only be tried in the Crown Court on indictment and is categorised as a class 3 offence.Elements of the offence of robberyA person is guilty of robbery if:•they steal something,
Proprietary estoppelThis Practice Note considers proprietary estoppel from a generic standpoint.For industry specific guidance on proprietary estoppel, see Practice Notes:•Estoppel and property law•Mortgages by estoppelProprietary estoppel—what is it?Unlike the other forms of estoppel (see Practice
0330 161 1234