The following Employment precedent Produced in partnership with Natasha Joffe of Outer Temple Chambers provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The Claimant was employed by the Respondent from [insert date] as a cycle courier working from the Respondent’s premises as [insert address]. The Respondent is a company which undertakes delivery services in the Greater London area.
The Claimant’s contract with the Respondent included the following terms:
that the Claimant agreed to work flexibly in accordance with the Respondent’s Zero Hours Scheme;
that the Claimant had no set daily or weekly working hours and there might be periods when no work was provided to the Claimant and the Respondent was under no obligation to provide the Claimant with any work;
that the Claimant would make himself available for work
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
The offence of false imprisonmentFalse imprisonment is a common law offence but it is more common as a civil action in tort (see Practice Note: False imprisonment).It is triable only on indictment. It may be classified in class 2A, 2B or 3 in accordance with the Criminal Practice Directions.The
Produced with input from Rebecca Cousin of Slaughter and May on market practice.This Practice Note summarises the rules and guidance in relation to parties who are, or may be presumed to be, acting in concert for the purposes of The City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (the Code). In particular the
What is QOCS?Qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS) was introduced on 1 April 2013 as part of the Jackson costs reforms following the removal of a claimant’s right to recover additional liabilities from the defendant, ie success fees and after the event (ATE) insurance premiums. The relevant CPR
IntroductionA defendant may decide to make a submission of no case to answer after the claimant has indicated that it has closed its case and before the defendant calls any evidence. It is only done where the defendant is extremely confident that the claimant has not presented the court with
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.