The following Employment precedent provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
[Insert in para 8.2 of claim form ET1:]
The Claimant was employed by the Respondent as a [service engineer] from [insert date]. [[His OR Her OR Their] contract of employment included a notice period of [insert details, eg three months].]
On [insert date], the Claimant was summarily dismissed by the [Service Manager][insert name] for allegedly falsifying [his OR her OR their] time sheet.
The manager refused to give the Claimant particulars of the allegation (which the Claimant denies), and the Claimant was therefore unable to give any explanation of the matter. When the Claimant asked if a colleague could be present during the discussion with the manager, at which the dismissal occurred, the manager de
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Scott Schedules are often very useful in construction disputes. They help to identify the key issues between the parties, and to set out for the judge in a single document a summary of the parties’ rival cases on an item-by-item basis.The need for a Scott Schedule in construction cases arises
Defending a tort claim—general considerationsIn reality, many claims are ‘defended’ on the basis that the defendant either did not owe the claimant a duty, or there was no breach of duty or there was a break in the chain of causation.In each of those cases, the claimant has failed to establish that
This Practice Note considers claims for damages for breach of statutory duty. For guidance on claims for damages for a negligent breach of duty of care outside a statutory duty, see Practice Notes:•Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?•Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?Breach of
Private nuisancePrivate nuisance is an unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over or in connection with it. Interference must be unreasonable, and may be caused, eg by water, smoke, smell, fumes, gas, noise, heat or vibrations. Where the defendant has not
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.