Defence of a highway authority against a claim for flooding
Defence of a highway authority against a claim for flooding

The following PI & Clinical Negligence precedent provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:

  • Defence of a highway authority against a claim for flooding

[In the High Court of Justice

OR

In the County Court at [insert]]

[[Specify division]]

[[Specify Specialist court]]

[[Insert location] District Registry]

Claim No: [insert claim number]

Between

  1. [A B]        Claimants

  1. and

  1. [X Y]        Defendants

Defence

    1. 1

      Paragraph 1 of the Particulars of Claim is admitted.

    1. 2

      The Defendants are unable to admit or to deny and therefore require the Claimant to prove the facts and matters alleged in paragraph 2 of the Particulars of Claim.

    1. 3

      Negligence, breach of statutory duty and causation as alleged in paragraph 3 of the Particulars of Claim, or at all, are each denied.

    1. 4

      It is denied that the Defendants were guilty of nuisance as alleged under paragraph 4 of the Particulars of Claim or at all.

    1. 5

      If, which is not admitted, the Claimant’s car skidded in a flood which had formed

Related documents:

Popular documents