Claim on behalf of service personnel against the Ministry of Defence for a non-freezing cold injury
Produced in partnership with David Robinson of Thompsons solicitors
Claim on behalf of service personnel against the Ministry of Defence for a non-freezing cold injury

The following PI & Clinical Negligence precedent produced in partnership with David Robinson of Thompsons solicitors provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:

  • Claim on behalf of service personnel against the Ministry of Defence for a non-freezing cold injury

Brexit: The UK's departure from the EU has implications for practitioners considering claims against the Ministry of Defence for a non-freezing cold injury. This Precedent is in the process of being updated in light of these changes. Before continuing your research, see Practice Note: What does IP completion day mean for PI & Clinical Negligence claims?

Claim No: [insert]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION

BETWEEN

  1. AB        Claimant

  1. and

  1. THE MINISTRY OF DEFENCE        Defendant

_____________________________________________________________________________

PARTICULARS OF CLAIM

_____________________________________________________________________________

    1. 1

      At all material times the Claimant was serving with British Armed Forces, specifically the [Army OR Royal Navy OR Royal Air Force], with [insert regiment]. The Claimant has service number [insert] and enlisted on [insert]. The Claimant [held OR holds] the rank of [insert] having attained the requisite standard. On account of sustaining a non-freezing cold injury to [insert body parts], as described below, the Claimant [was OR will be] medically discharged from service on [insert date].

    1. 2

      In [insert month and year] the Claimant was serving in [insert location]. While serving in this location the Claimant was exposed to cold weather conditions for approximately [insert period of time]. Such cold weather included [insert relevant fact-specific examples]. During this time the Claimant was required to [insert activities which the Claimant was required to undertake in such cold weather conditions]. During such activities the Defendant failed to provide the Claimant with cold weather

Popular documents