The following Corporate precedent provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
[insert company name] [LIMITED OR PLC]
Minutes of a meeting of the board of directors of [insert full name of company] (the Company)
held at [insert place of meeting]
on [insert date of meeting] at [insert time of meeting] [am OR pm]
Notice and quorum
[insert name] was appointed Chair of the meeting. It was reported that proper notice of the meeting had been given in accordance with the Company’s articles of association (the Articles) and that a quorum was present. Accordingly, the Chair declared the meeting open.
Business of the meeting
The Chair reported that the purpose of the meeting was to appoint a committee of the board (the Committee) to which the board proposed to delegate certain of its powers for the purposes of [insert details] (the Purposes).
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
When defendants are guilty, they have a choice to plead guilty or to put the prosecution to proof. When they plead guilty they may benefit from a reduction in their sentence as a result, see Practice Note: Credit for guilty plea. However, the Sentencing Council's overarching guidelines on reduction
There may be times when, rather than assigning the benefit of an agreement to a third party, the original parties wish instead to end their obligations to each other under that agreement and, in effect, recreate it, with the third party stepping into the shoes of one of the original parties. This is
Having established that a duty of care exists (see Practice Note: Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?), it is then necessary to consider whether or not there has been a breach of that duty. This will depend on a number of factors outlined below and considered against the general background of
This Practice Note considers the legal concept of mistake in contract law. It examines common mistake, mutual mistake, unilateral mistake, mistake as to identity and mistake as to the document signed (non est factum). It also considers the impact of each of these types of mistake on the contract and
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.