The following Corporate precedent provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Authority to allot shares—no distinction made between different classes of shares (general or specific authority)
Save to the extent that they are authorised to do so by these articles or from time to time by ordinary resolution of the company, the directors of the company shall not exercise any power of the company to allot shares or to grant rights to subscribe for, or to convert any security into, any shares in the company.
Subject to article 1.3[, OR and] 1.4 [and [insert reference to any relevant articles that set out pre-emption rights]], the directors are [generally and unconditionally authorised, for the purpose of section 551 of the CA 2006 and generally, to exercise all and any powers of the company to allot shares and to grant rights to subscribe for, or to convert any security into, shares in the company to any person, at any time and subject to any terms and conditions as the directors think proper, up to an aggregate nominal amount of £[insert maximum nominal amount] OR specifically authorised, for the purpose of section 551 of the CA 2006 and generally, to [insert details of the specific authority to allot and to grant rights to subscribe for, or to convert any security into, shares in the company, including any conditions that it may be subject to]].
The authority set
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
An ad hoc arbitration is any arbitration in which the parties have not selected an institution to administer the arbitration. This offers parties flexibility as to the conduct of the arbitration, but less external support for the process. It can be quicker than institutional arbitration but not if
Having established that a duty of care exists (see Practice Note: Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?), it is then necessary to consider whether or not there has been a breach of that duty. This will depend on a number of factors outlined below and considered against the general background of
What is QOCS?Qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS) was introduced on 1 April 2013 as part of the Jackson costs reforms following the removal of a claimant’s right to recover additional liabilities from the defendant, ie success fees and after the event (ATE) insurance premiums. The relevant CPR
This Practice Note considers the doctrine of forum non conveniens, also referred to as the appropriate forum or the proper place for a dispute to be determined. This doctrine is of relevance when determining whether the courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction to hear a dispute and is applied
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.