- Where does care regime stop and deprivation of liberty begin?
- Original news
- What as the background to the case?
- What was the issue for the CoP to decide?
- How did the CoP go about deciding that issue?
- What is the difference between a private deprivation of liberty and deprivation under ECHR, art 5?
- What steps are to be taken to obtain welfare orders from the CoP where the arrangements are made by deputies administering damages awards?
- Under what circumstances is a deputy required to bring a deprivation of liberty situation to the attention of the local authority?
- Does this case assist in clarifying a local authority’s obligations to bring applications to the court’s attention?
- What will this decision mean for future deprivation of liberty cases?
Local Government analysis: Sam Karim, a barrister at Kings Chambers, and Melanie Varey, an associate solicitor at Stephensons Solicitors, advise that the decision in Staffordshire County Council v SKR will result in an increase in applications made by local authorities where they consider that a privately arranged package of care constitutes a deprivation of liberty that will require authorisation by the court.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial