- When is a frolic not a frolic? (Victory House v RGB P&C)
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
- Natural justice
- The Part 8 procedure
- Case details
Construction analysis: The court held that, on a question of contractual interpretation, the adjudicator was not bound to adopt one or the other party’s preferred interpretation, and could reach his own conclusion as to proper construction, provided that the parties had an opportunity to comment on the meaning of the relevant words. Daniel Churcher of 4 Pump Court Chambers considers the judgment and its implications.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial