Legal News

Wasted costs—a cautionary tale (MAL v PPC)

Wasted costs—a cautionary tale (MAL v PPC)
Published on: 31 August 2016
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Wasted costs—a cautionary tale (MAL v PPC)
  • Original news
  • What are the practical implications of this judgment?
  • Facts and chronology of events
  • First Proceedings
  • Second Proceedings
  • Third proceedings
  • Background to wasted costs application
  • Conduct of the litigation
  • Inproper, unreasonable and solicitor-led steps taken
  • More...

Article summary

Dispute Resolution analysis: The decision of Judge Seys-Llewellyn QC provides an insight into the practical application of the authorities on wasted costs, in particular the Court of Appeal decision in Ridehalgh v Horsfield and the tests of whether a solicitor has conduct of litigation and causes costs to be wasted. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents