Legal News

USA—court rejects argument that JAMS arbitration agreement was unconscionable (Monster Energy v City Beverages)

USA—court rejects argument that JAMS arbitration agreement was unconscionable (Monster Energy v City Beverages)
Published on: 22 February 2021
Published by: Law360
  • USA—court rejects argument that JAMS arbitration agreement was unconscionable (Monster Energy v City Beverages)
  • What did the court decide?

Article summary

Law360: A California judge rejected arguments that JAMS was biased in a dispute involving Monster Energy when it urged the US Supreme Court to clarify guidelines on arbitrator disclosure requirements, calling it ‘highly speculative’ that the alternative dispute resolution (ADR) services provider’s position on the issue could affect its arbitrators’ impartiality. The judge ordered the parties, under their arbitration agreement, to arbitrate their dispute before JAMS. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents