Legal News

Unravelling property interests in abortive transactions (Micheal v Phillips)

Unravelling property interests in abortive transactions (Micheal v Phillips)
Published on: 28 March 2017
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Unravelling property interests in abortive transactions (Micheal v Phillips)
  • Original news
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What were the property claims?
  • What did the court decide?
  • Did Mr Micheal have a business tenancy?
  • Did the Phillips hold the freehold of the building on constructive trust for Mr Micheal?
  • Case details

Article summary

Property analysis: The court held that in the aftermath of an abortive company sale, the company retained a tenancy within the relevant building, but did not have a right to the freehold interest. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents