Legal News

Trends in NOM clauses and the implications for other contract variations (Rock Advertising Ltd v MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd)

Trends in NOM clauses and the implications for other contract variations (Rock Advertising Ltd v MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd)
Published on: 12 November 2018
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Trends in NOM clauses and the implications for other contract variations (Rock Advertising Ltd v MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd)
  • What are the recent trends in the enforceability of NOM clauses? What are the implications of the Rock Advertising decision for NOM clauses and what areas of uncertainty remain?
  • What are the implications of such trends and the Rock Advertising decision beyond NOM clauses?
  • How should commercial parties respond to such trends?
  • How has the Rock Advertising decision impacted commercial or legal practice?

Article summary

Commercial analysis: James Carter, partner, Elinor Thomas, legal director, and Tom Mead, associate, at DLA Piper UK LLP, consider the implications of the recent Supreme Court judgment in Rock Advertising Ltd v MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd. The judgment concerns the enforcement of no oral modification (NOM) clauses in contracts, as well as the wider ramifications for other contract variations. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents