Legal News

The transcript may not lie but it does not tell the whole story—difficulties of summary determination of oral contract and unjust enrichment claims (Richards v Kulczyk)

Published on: 25 April 2022
Published by: LexisPSL
  • The transcript may not lie but it does not tell the whole story—difficulties of summary determination of oral contract and unjust enrichment claims (Richards v Kulczyk)
  • What are the practical implications of this case
  • What was the background?
  • What did the court decide?
  • Case details

Article summary

Dispute Resolution analysis: This case is of interest to practitioners for three reasons. First, when oral contracts are in issue, determination on a summary basis is rarely appropriate—and the existence of a transcript does not necessarily change that. Second, the interaction between unjust enrichment and contract is a complex area of law. This case stands as a warning that practitioners should be wary about seeking summary determination of unjust enrichment claims when a relevant contract may be lurking in the background. Third, an argument that there has been a breach of the duty to provide full and frank disclosure can come too late; any such argument should be raised at the earliest opportunity if it is to bite. Written by Tim Benham-Mirando, barrister at Serle Court (and junior counsel in the case). or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents