- The test to discharge a special guardianship order (Re M (special guardianship order—leave to apply to discharge))
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
- ChA 1989, s 14D
- Parental contact where an SGO is in force
Family analysis: In Re M (special guardianship order: leave to apply to discharge), the Court of Appeal considered applications under section 14D of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) to discharge a special guardianship order (SGO) and child arrangements orders where an SGO is in place, finding that the word ‘significant’ as to the requirement for a ‘significant change of circumstances’ in ChA 1989, s 14D creates a higher threshold than the similar tests for the revocation of a placement order or permission to oppose the making of an adoption order. Ruth Cabeza, barrister at Harcourt Chambers, examines the issues.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial