- The doctor’s fitness test (General Medical Council v Krishnan)
- Original news
- What was the background to the case?
- What issue arose for the court's consideration?
- What did the court decide, and why?
- To what extent is the judgment helpful in clarifying the law in this area? Are there still any unresolved issues practitioners will need to watch out for?
- How does the decision fit in with other developments in this area of law?
- What are the implications for practitioners? What will they need to be mindful of when advising in this area?
Local Government analysis: The Supreme Court's recently redefined test for dishonesty in Ivey v Genting Casinos meant a tribunal's earlier decision in a doctor's fitness to practise case could not stand. Ivan Hare QC, of Blackstone Chambers, explains the Administrative Court's reasoning in GMC v Krishnan.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial