Legal News

The contractual relationship between parties and their adjudicator (Linnett v Harding)

Published on: 31 July 2017
Published by: LexisPSL
  • The contractual relationship between parties and their adjudicator (Linnett v Harding)
  • Original news
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What was this case about?
  • What did the judge decide?
  • Case details

Article summary

Construction analysis: In the latest Technology and Construction Court (TCC) decision to come out of the Harding v Paice saga, Alexander Nissen QC sitting as a deputy analyses the contractual position of a party who participates in an adjudication under a reservation of rights, and declines to accept the adjudicator’s offered terms. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the court found that William Harding Ltd in this case had concluded a contract with the adjudicator by conduct, and that the terms of that contract were the adjudicator’s standard terms, those being the only terms on offer. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents