- Tenancy can be inferred from conduct at common law, despite partial overlap in identities of landlord and tenant (Procter v Procter)
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
- Case details
Property Disputes analysis: The Court of Appeal has held that a tenancy from A as landlord to AB jointly as tenant can be inferred from conduct at common law, or created orally and that it is conceptually possible for a tenant to have exclusive possession in such circumstances, even where there is an overlap between the individuals comprising the landlord and tenant. It further held that a tenancy at will is a true tenancy which can be protected by the Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 (AHA 1986), subject to certain exceptions, and that a tenancy in a case of mixed agricultural and non-agricultural use could be protected by AHA 1986 even where 27% of the holding had been converted into a golf course. Written by Edward Peters, barrister at Falcon Chambers.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial