- TCC enforces fifth adjudication decision in Paice v Harding saga
- Original news
- What are the practical implications of this judgment?
- What was this case about?
- Was the decision communicated in time?
- Was there apparent bias?
- Did the adjudicator have jurisdiction to consider the whole of the dispute?
- Case details
Dispute Resolution analysis: The defendant to this adjudication enforcement action in the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) opposed enforcement on three grounds—the adjudicator’s decision was late, there was apparent bias on the part of the adjudicator, and the adjudicator had exceeded his jurisdiction. The court rejected the first two grounds and severed that part of the decision that was in excess of jurisdiction. Daniel Churcher of 4 Pump Court chambers considers the judgment and its practical implications.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial