- Supreme Court restricts Hill ‘immunity’ for police in negligence claims (Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police)
- What are the practical implications of the decision?
- What was the background?
- What did the Supreme Court decide?
Personal injury analysis: Duncan Fairgrieve, senior fellow in Comparative Law at the British Institute of International and Comparative Law and barrister at 1 Crown Office Row, examines the Supreme Court’s decision that the police do not enjoy a general immunity from suit in respect of their negligent acts when investigating or preventing crime—they are under a duty of care to avoid causing personal injury where such a duty would arise according to ordinary principles of the law of negligence.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial