- Supreme Court—no separate rating for stores’ ATM sites (Cardtronics UK Ltd v Sykes)
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the Supreme Court decide?
- Case details
Property analysis: Emily Wood, a partner at DMH Stallard, examines the Supreme Court’s decision that the rateable occupation of the sites of automated teller machines (ATMs) situated inside and outside retail outlets was by the retailers and therefore such sites should not be assessed separately for business rates.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial