- Supreme Court lifts stay of award enforcement (Micula v Romania)
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- In the context of Brexit, are there any implications for practitioners?
- How may the decision be perceived by EU institutions such as the Commission?
- What was the background to the judgment?
- Micula & Ors v Romania & Anor  EWHC 31 (Comm) and  EWHC 1430 (Comm)
- Micula & Ors v Romania & Anor  EWCA Civ 1801
- GCEU decision
- What issues were before the Supreme Court?
- What did the court decide?
- What was Supreme Court’s decision in relation to the stay of enforcement?
- What was the Supreme Court’s decision in relation to security?
- Case details
Arbitration analysis: Matthieu Gregoire, barrister at 4 New Square, considers the latest judgment in Micula v Romania in which the Supreme Court lifted the stay to the enforcement of the Micula International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) award.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial