- Supreme Court decides when judgment can be set aside for fraud (Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd)
- What are the practical implications of the judgment?
- What was the background?
- What did the Supreme Court decide?
Dispute Resolution analysis: John Wardell QC and Andrew Mold, barristers at Wilberforce Chambers, examine the Supreme Court’s decision in Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd, that a person who applies to set aside an earlier judgment on the basis of fraud does not have to demonstrate that the evidence of this fraud could not have been obtained with reasonable diligence before the earlier trial.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial