Legal News

Supreme Court considers foster carers and vicarious liability (Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council)

Supreme Court considers foster carers and vicarious liability (Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council)
Published on: 24 October 2017
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Supreme Court considers foster carers and vicarious liability (Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council)
  • Original news
  • What is the significance of this case? Why is it important for practitioners?
  • What was the background to the case?
  • What issues arose for the Supreme Court’s consideration?
  • What did the court decide, and why?
  • To what extent is the judgment helpful in clarifying the law in this area? Are there still any unresolved issues practitioners will need to watch out for?
  • What can we take from this decision and other recent decisions about the relationship between local authorities and the foster carers that they work with?
  • What impact will this decision have on how children are placed with foster parents or is this mostly a legacy issue?
  • How does the decision fit in with other developments in this area of law? Do you have any predictions for future developments in this area?
  • More...

Article summary

Local Government analysis: Can a local authority be liable for the abuse of a child by foster parents even though it had not been negligent in selecting or supervising them? Philip Davy, of Ropewalk Chambers, examines the Supreme Court’s answer in Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents