- Supreme Court allows appeal against HMRC's disclosure of confidential information (Ingenious v HMRC)
- Original news
- Practical implications of this judgment
- Marcel principle of confidentiality
- Statutory exceptions to the general duty of confidentiality
- Confidential information in the public domain
- Breach of confidentiality determined by the court
- Passing confidential information on 'in confidence'
- Circumstances in which HMRC might take the press into its confidence
- Case details
Dispute Resolution analysis: The Supreme Court has rejected HMRC's argument that it was entitled to disclose confidential information regarding the claimants' tax activities to journalists under section 18(2)(a) of the Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act 2005 (CRCA 2005). In doing so, it has considered the scope of the duty of confidentiality owed by HMRC in respect of the tax affairs of tax payers, including the extent of statutory exceptions to the Marcel principle.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial