- Sufficient evidence and the burden of proof (Whyatt and others v Powell and another)
- Original news
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What issues did this case raise?
- To what extent is the judgment helpful in clarifying the law in this area?
- What are the implications for practitioners? What will they need to be mindful of when advising in this area? Any best practice tips?
- Are there still any grey areas practitioners will need to watch out for? If so, how can they avoid any possible problems?
Personal Injury analysis: Dr Robert Whittock, barrister at Hardwick Chambers, explores Whyatt and others v Powell and another and examines the degree of evidence required to properly establish the claimants’ knowledge of travelling in an uninsured vehicle.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial