Legal News

Sufficient evidence and the burden of proof (Whyatt and others v Powell and another)

Sufficient evidence and the burden of proof (Whyatt and others v Powell and another)
Published on: 05 April 2017
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Sufficient evidence and the burden of proof (Whyatt and others v Powell and another)
  • Original news
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What issues did this case raise?
  • To what extent is the judgment helpful in clarifying the law in this area?
  • What are the implications for practitioners? What will they need to be mindful of when advising in this area? Any best practice tips?
  • Are there still any grey areas practitioners will need to watch out for? If so, how can they avoid any possible problems?

Article summary

Personal Injury analysis: Dr Robert Whittock, barrister at Hardwick Chambers, explores Whyatt and others v Powell and another and examines the degree of evidence required to properly establish the claimants’ knowledge of travelling in an uninsured vehicle. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents