Legal News

Solicitor and client retainers—termination by solicitor must be reasonable to recover costs (Manjit Gill v Heer Manak Solicitors)

Published on: 01 November 2018
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Solicitor and client retainers—termination by solicitor must be reasonable to recover costs (Manjit Gill v Heer Manak Solicitors)
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What was the background
  • What did the court decide?
  • Case details:

Article summary

Dispute Resolution analysis: This High Court decision is a must-read for practitioners, providing a concise overview of the law concerning solicitors’ retainers, terminating these on short notice and the effect on a solicitor’s ability to recover costs in such circumstances. In this case, notwithstanding that the law firm in question had closed down abruptly, due to a failure to obtain professional indemnity insurance, Mr Justice Walker found the firm had behaved unreasonably in terminating the retainer at very short notice, leaving a client in the lurch, with a trial four months away. Consequently, the firm was unable to recover its unpaid costs. Written by Matthew Purcell, partner, and head of dispute resolution, at Saunders Law. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents