- Risk assessments for breastfeeding workers and discrimination (Ramos v Servicio Galego de Saúde)
- Original news
- What is the impact of this Opinion?
- What is the relevant law in this area?
- What were the background facts?
- What did the Spanish courts decide?
- What was the Opinion of the Advocate General?
- Case details
Employment analysis: Where a risk assessment under Article 4(1) of the Pregnant Workers Directive 92/85 is carried out there must be an examination of the individual situation of the worker who is breastfeeding to establish whether the safety and health of her or her child is at risk in accordance with that provision, Annex I and the guidelines laid down in Article 3(1) of that directive. A failure to carry out such an assessment correctly is less favourable treatment of the worker concerned and constitutes discrimination for the purposes of Article 2(2)(c) of Directive 2006/54 (the ‘Equal Treatment Directive’). Such treatment is discrimination based on sex within the meaning of Article 19(4)(a) of the Equal Treatment Directive and thus falls within the scope of the rules laid down in Article 19(1) that place the burden of proof upon the respondent. It is for the national court to verify whether the facts of the case before it demonstrate discriminatory treatment. In so far as it is necessary in the context of the national proceedings for that court to determine whether further action (and if so, what action) should have been taken pursuant to Article 5 of the Pregnant Workers Directive to protect the safety and health of the worker concerned, the provisions of Article 19 of the Equal Treatment Directive (ie the reverse burden of proof) apply to that assessment. ECJ AG Opinion: Ramos v Servicio Galego de Saúde.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial