Legal News

Reversioner defeats collective enfranchisement notice by transfer and transfer back (Curzon v Wolstenholme)

Reversioner defeats collective enfranchisement notice by transfer and transfer back (Curzon v Wolstenholme)
Published on: 26 July 2017
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Reversioner defeats collective enfranchisement notice by transfer and transfer back (Curzon v Wolstenholme)
  • Original news
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What is the law in this area?
  • What did the Court of Appeal decide?
  • What were the court’s conclusions on the notice issue?
  • What did the court decide on the disputed price issue?
  • Case details

Article summary

Property analysis: The Court of Appeal decided that an initial notice under the collective enfranchisement regime was no longer valid where the reversioner transferred the reversion to his wife following service of the notice and the wife then re-transferred it to him. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents