- Rectifying mistakes in wills post-Marley v Rawling
- Original news
- What issues did this case raise? Why is it significant?
- What did the court decide?
- To what extent is the judgment helpful in clarifying the law in this area?
- What does all this mean for lawyers and their clients? What should they do next?
- How does this fit in with other developments in this area? Do you have any predictions for future developments?
Private Client analysis: Paula James, partner at Thomas Eggar, discusses the recent judgment of Slattery v Jagger, the latest in a line of cases that allow for wills to either be rectified or construed by the court in order to give effect to the testator’s intentions. It also serves as a salutary warning to private client practitioners to approach the will-drafting process with care and diligence as it could result in solicitors beginning to shoulder some of the costs burden in contested probate cases.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial