Legal News

Property Disputes weekly highlights—23 August 2018

Property Disputes weekly highlights—23 August 2018
Published on: 23 August 2018
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Property Disputes weekly highlights—23 August 2018
  • In this issue:
  • Disputes and remedies
  • Parties ordered to revise disproportionate costs budgets (Red and White Services Ltd v Phil Anslow Ltd)
  • Misrepresentation—Clutterbuck v Cleghorn (sued as Judicial factor to the Estate of Nichol, Deceased)
  • Court upholds non-party’s right to access various documents disclosed at trial (Cape Intermediate Holdings Ltd v Dring)
  • Summary judgment or trial in a case of an estate dispute? (Perry v Neupert)
  • 2018 edition of the Queen’s Bench Guide has been published
  • Scheduled CPR rule and practice direction changes
  • Collateral warranty claim time-barred
  • More...

Article summary

This week’s edition of Property Disputes highlights includes a High Court decision in respect of disproportionate cost budgets, a failed claim for damages for fraudulent or negligent misrepresentation, a Court of Appeal ruling in respect of the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction to allow a respondent access to trial documents in other proceedings involving the appellant but not the respondent, and a Court of Appeal decision as to whether in calculating the premium in respect of a lease extension under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993, the no-Act assumption extends to the whole block, or just applies to the flat in question. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents