Legal News

Procedural exclusivity, limitation and expert evidence in human rights challenges (PP v Home Office and another)

Procedural exclusivity, limitation and expert evidence in human rights challenges (PP v Home Office and another)
Published on: 30 May 2017
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Procedural exclusivity, limitation and expert evidence in human rights challenges (PP v Home Office and another)
  • Original news
  • What is the background to this case?
  • What were the key preliminary issues?
  • What did the court decide in each case and what happens next?
  • What guidance does the decision provide?
  • What are the key take-away points for practitioners?

Article summary

Public Law analysis: A failure to investigate whether a domestic worker from Sri Lanka was a victim of human trafficking by the Home Office was subject to a court ruling in PP v Home Office. Joanna Thomson, of Deighton Pierce Glynn Solicitors, outlines the case and says the judgment provides clarity on a number of issues including limitations and the admissibility of expert evidence. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents