- Pleading of malice in relation to the publication of spent convictions (Greenstein v Campaign Against Antisemitism)
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
- Case details
TMT analysis: The Court of Appeal has upheld a decision to strike out particulars of malice pleaded in relation to the publication of spent convictions. The judgment highlights the strict rules when pleading allegations of malice, with a specific reference to the relevance of malice to the defence of truth and spent convictions in the context of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (ROA 1974). Written by Michael Frost, managing associate and Joshua Edwards, trainee solicitor at Mishcon de Reya LLP.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial