Legal News

Planning weekly highlights—14 January 2021

Planning weekly highlights—14 January 2021
Published on: 14 January 2021
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Planning weekly highlights—14 January 2021
  • In this issue:
  • Planning obligations
  • Court of Appeal finds unilateral undertaking insufficient to cure erroneous condition (Ikram v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government)
  • High Court declines to strike out ordinary claim based on the construction of s 106 agreement (Aspire Luxury Homes (Eversley) Ltd v Hart District Council)
  • Environmental impact assessment
  • Indirect effects—the scope of the environmental impact assessment (Finch v Surrey County Council)
  • Community infrastructure levy
  • Time period for Mayor of London to spend CIL receipts of repaying money borrowed for Crossrail to be extended
  • Brexit
  • More...

Article summary

This week's edition of Planning weekly highlights includes: case analysis on whether a section 106 agreement can cure an erroneous condition and whether questions of interpretation of section 106 agreements can proceed via a normal civil claim, case analysis confirming that downstream emissions were not capable of constituting indirect effects for environmental impact assessment purposes, announcement of an inquiry into the environmental aspects of the UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement, a Clean Air White Paper for Wales, new building safety plans for Wales, and case analysis on drafting requirements for an information for a breach of enforcement notice. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents