- PII material and search warrant cases—a balancing act (CMA v Concordia International RX)
- What are the practical implications of the case?
- What is the background to the decision?
- What did the court decide?
Dispute Resolution analysis: Jason Beer QC and Charlotte Ventham, barristers at 5 Essex Court, who successfully acted for the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) in CMA v Concordia International RX, explain the background to the case and consider the implications of the judgment for other regulators and civil enforcement bodies.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial