- Permission to continue derivative action—points not raised or argued at first instance (Popely v Popely)
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
- Case details
Dispute Resolution analysis: Applying previous Court of Appeal authority, the court held that an appellate court, even at the level of a single judge, should not ordinarily hear new issues raised for the first time on appeal save in exceptional circumstances, although there was a discretion to do so where the matter was a pure point of law.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial