Legal News

Payment of deposit by developer not a condition precedent to exercise of option (Peacock v Imagine Property Developments)

Payment of deposit by developer not a condition precedent to exercise of option (Peacock v Imagine Property Developments)
Published on: 30 October 2018
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Payment of deposit by developer not a condition precedent to exercise of option (Peacock v Imagine Property Developments)
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What was the background?
  • What did the court decide?
  • Case details

Article summary

Construction analysis: The Technology and Construction Court held that payment of a deposit was not a condition precedent to exercising an option for the purchase and development of land. Further, the owners had waived the requirement for the developer to pay the deposit (or were estopped from insisting on such payment). Accordingly, the owners were in repudiatory breach by refusing to accept the exercise of the option, and were liable to the developer for loss of profit. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents