Legal News

Opinion from Court of Justice—European orders for payment and consumers (Bondora (Judicial cooperation in civil matters—European order for payment procedure—Opinion))

Opinion from Court of Justice—European orders for payment and consumers (Bondora (Judicial cooperation in civil matters—European order for payment procedure—Opinion))
Published on: 04 November 2019
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Opinion from Court of Justice—European orders for payment and consumers (Bondora (Judicial cooperation in civil matters—European order for payment procedure—Opinion))
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What was the background?
  • What did the court decide?
  • Case details

Article summary

Dispute Resolution analysis: The Advocate General considered whether the European regulation permitted a court seized of a request to issue a European order for payment (EOP) to require the applicant to provide the full text of a contract between the claimant and a consumer to enable the court to consider whether the contract contained unfair terms and, under Article 6(1) of Directive 93/13/EEC should not be enforced. His opinion was that this question should be answered in the affirmative. Written by Iain G Mitchell QC (Scotland), barrister, at Tanfield Chambers. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents