- Opinion from Court of Justice—European orders for payment and consumers (Bondora (Judicial cooperation in civil matters—European order for payment procedure—Opinion))
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
- Case details
Dispute Resolution analysis: The Advocate General considered whether the European regulation permitted a court seized of a request to issue a European order for payment (EOP) to require the applicant to provide the full text of a contract between the claimant and a consumer to enable the court to consider whether the contract contained unfair terms and, under Article 6(1) of Directive 93/13/EEC should not be enforced. His opinion was that this question should be answered in the affirmative. Written by Iain G Mitchell QC (Scotland), barrister, at Tanfield Chambers.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial