Legal News

No nuisance by overlooking (Fearn v Trustees of the Tate Gallery)

No nuisance by overlooking (Fearn v Trustees of the Tate Gallery)
Published on: 19 February 2020
Published by: LexisPSL
  • No nuisance by overlooking (Fearn v Trustees of the Tate Gallery)
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What was the background?
  • What did the court decide?
  • Case details

Article summary

Property Disputes analysis: In this case, the Court of Appeal firmly rejected the proposition that overlooking, even on a substantial scale (by many hundreds of thousands of people a year, using cameras and in some cases binoculars), could by itself constitute a private nuisance. Guy Fetherstonhaugh QC, Falcon Chambers, provides further analysis of this decision. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents