Legal News

No extension of time for claimant who relied on fees as reason for delay (Wray v Jewish Care)

No extension of time for claimant who relied on fees as reason for delay (Wray v Jewish Care)
Published on: 18 April 2019
Published by: LexisPSL
  • No extension of time for claimant who relied on fees as reason for delay (Wray v Jewish Care)
  • What are the practical implications of this judgment?
  • What is the relevant background?
  • Relevant law
  • Background facts
  • Decision of the employment tribunal
  • What did the EAT decide?
  • Court details

Article summary

Employment analysis: Whilst in some cases the requirement to pay a lodgement fee of £250, which applied before the Supreme Court decision in R (on the application of Unison) v Lord Chancellor on 26 July 2017, may render it not reasonably practicable for claims of unfair dismissal to have been lodged in time, each case is to be judged on its own facts, according to the EAT. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents